A dirty hack to make your docker-compose network services discoverable
The problem, broadly, is that I am working on a project with a circular network dependency. That means project A needs project B to boot, and project B needs project A to boot (except in the very specific circumstance that project A needs B … it’s mess)
This means that I need to connect two docker-compose networks together, and have the services find each other.
Additionally, I want to be able to connect to two applications that are normally exposed on the same port, but I don’t want to forward both ports to the localhost, or create a reverse proxy.
I am using Linux on the desktop. So, the way docker networks work (approximately) is:
A bridge network interface is created per network
Docker distributes IPs to each container within that bridge
Docker makes routes so that your desktop machine can connect to each of these containers. Magic!
This does mean that forwarding ports from localhost to the containers is a bit of a non starter. They’re all on a bridge network the host anyway right?
Well, docker doesn’t really provide a sane service discover mechanism. Additionally, docker-compose doesn’t seem to allow affixing an IP to a given container, and it certainly doesn’t allow management of networks.
The magic bullshit solution
The thing is, docker-compose already runs DNS internally. But it’s not reachable. I didn’t find an easy way to make whatever it is that’s running DNS accessible from the host.
BUT WE CAN RUN OUR OWN DNS SERVER!
Each of the containers is configured with the correct upstream resolver. So, all we have to do is access that resolver somehow.
$ docker run --publish 127.0.0.1:53:53/udp \
--network maschinenring \
Additionally, you have to do add the nameserver to your
/etc/resolv.conf. However, let’s unpack how it works:
We run a DNS container “dnsmasq”
“dnsmasq” checks the existing
/etc/resolv.confin the container and adds it as an upstream resolver
we add this dnsmasq as the upstream resolver in our
Magic addresses work!
This is a bad idea
This is a terrible idea. The peculiar set of circumstance that make it a reasonable thing to do with this project is that the project consists of multiple different applications managed differently but that all expect to be on the same network and addressable or they will not boot.
I’m currently fixing that.
Additionally, I’m using Linux on the desktop, which means the bridge networks get created in such a way that everything is addressable. It might not be that way on Mac or Windows.
Lastly, it feels awful.
This is a bad idea. But it does solve this specific problem I have. Finding the borders of technology is fun.